So ultimately seems private schools are better than public schools and no doubt, some of them are. Because though they are recruited through VYAPAM Samvida Shikshak Pariksha on temporary basis, they are given low salary and expected to work more than the permanent employee who get more than double of their salary.
It is usually unwise to predict the future. Pro Commercialization of education has been a fairly Negative points of commercialisation of education trend in China resulting from the educational reform in the last two decades.
These particular locations provide a space that aids physical wellbeing, however non-profit investments such as counselling, and health services enable students to take care of themselves emotionally and mentally.
The better infrastructure ultimately benefits the students. Finally very strong will power to bring change from the rudimentary level. Many times, one has to obey the management where most of the members who are not qualified to fit into that position.
Though the job opportunities have increased but salary has decreased. Why or why not?
What are the implications of such practice for teaching and learning? Poor management, scarce resources, lack of will power of teachers deteriorating the quality. Most of the parents of children enrolled in government schools are poor and illiterate.
State government has to improve education system in primary and middle school level. Education was something that was always driven by devotion and thought. Distal perspective would allow us to consider beyond ourselves into the future and beyond education into its ramification in other related and affected fields such as economy, sociology, politics, etc.
For this, we can adopt certain measures like- To pay proper wages to the teachers. However the amount of investment universities are applying in areas other than the direct education of their students, and the pay of their staff still raises a cause for concern amongst many.
As a stake-holder, what might be his reason for criticizing it? Or should they be resolved in other larger framework of reference? Aptly said by my opponent that commercialisation of education will lead to a drastic change in the traditional education styles involving a similar change in student-teacher relationship.
It seems as if they will give rise to a new industry named educational industry. It is clear that the commercialisation of education has muddied the waters when it comes to what the true focus of an educational establishment should be.
The financial structures of universities increasingly encourage students to see themselves as consumers of a commodity that is education. Depressingly, we are not averse to the idea of commercialisation. This has widened the gap between the poor and the rich.
Here are some important points, which should be taken into consideration while framing the policy. Private schools at big cities are good but quality at small urban areas like tehsil places is not on par.
However, government is ignorant on this part. Are we still in a position to say that profit is the sole driving motive for commercialisation? Ed colleges where degree is almost sold.
If we can put a price tag on learning and knowledge, how are the market values of education decided across disciplines and over time?
However, unlike commercialization in other aspects of social life, education commercialization is running against two fundamental concepts in China. An orphanage or a school for the blind with minimal fees for education, work for the societal welfare and not specifically for profit motive.
Children admitted in Private Schools are studying at three places. Government mechanism is utterly failing in this aspect. On the other hand, teachers are underpaid but are expected to give their best by hook or crook.
Such colleges are even running in a story houses and have become center for selling degrees. So finally, we have to make our foundation very strong that is from elementary school system to higher learning institutions.
Influential people own most of such institutions where goal is to extort money in the name of fees for various purposes. This reaction strikes a secondary consideration to the question of commercialisation — Is the real issue about the validity that staff and students feel?
It is to challenge students, to provoke new ways of thinking, to make students uneasy with what they have taken for granted.'Commercialization of education' is a very common and a simple phenomenon these days and perhaps my opponent has made use of such technical language as to make it seem a 'complex' topic.
My learned friend has merely taken China in consideration while explaining about the commercialisation.
"Negative Points Of Commercialisation Of Education" Essays and Research Papers Negative Points Of Commercialisation Of Education "No, I want my child to study.
Here are some important points, which should be taken into consideration while framing the policy. Privatization in education has increased the opportunities by increasing the scope of admissions in all levels of education.
The positive and negative impact on commercialization of education is discuses below— Merits of Commercialization of Education: Commercialization has a positive impact on education. Some of the important aspects are as follows: 1.
Employment opportunity: Commercialization of education provides employment opportunity. The Commercialisation of Higher Education (HE) has been in debate for over a decade. In recent years however, the gap between Higher Education Institutes in the UK and their staff and students has dramatically widened.
From the time when education started its first phase of commercialisation, the responsibilities of the teacher too, have been compromised. As Turk points out: Unlike a retail clerk, the teacher’s role is not to sell a product or please customers.Download