He is questioning democracy. This institution succeeded in punishing slaves as well as Thoreau himself. Certainly, it is not simply a question of whether or not a modern day Thoreau would have obeyed traffic signs.
He was a gifted speaker and a powerful writer whose philosophy was non-violent but direct action. Such a fundamental immorality justifies any difficulty or expense to bring to an end. According to Sanderson Beck: Thoreau says use your life to stop the machine. Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man?
The environment became especially tense after the Fugitive Slave Act of This quote shows Dr.
As governments go, he felt, the U. This American government,-- what is it but a tradition Why should a court of law determine whether or not a man had the right to be free, if that individual exercised his will with regard to sound mind and conscience?
I heartily accept the motto,—"That government is best which governs least;" and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. We are all tied together in a mutual destiny; we are all in the same boat, what ever affects you affects me.
King explains, " injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Why has every man a conscience, then. The one that is intended in this case is "relating to citizens and their interrelations with one another or with the state", and so civil disobedience means "disobedience to the state".
Or rather, he would urge us to stand up as individuals, take revolutionary action against the established order with autonomy, reason and intellect. He is a peaceful man and wants justice, but believes in following the rules peacefully to get the job done.
A lifelong abolitionistThoreau delivered an impassioned speech which would later become Civil Disobedience injust months after leaving Walden Pond. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right But if the law is itself clearly unjust, and the lawmaking process is not designed to quickly obliterate such unjust laws, then Thoreau says the law deserves no respect and it should be broken.
The other thing that happens is King is respecting the law by obeying it. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly" King p. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. King is explaining his view of conscience: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once.
Thoreau saw a government that in his perception was often immoral, overbearing, and self-righteous.
This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible. Even though both writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have opposite ways of convicing you.
It is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves; and, if ever they should use it in earnest as a real one against each other, it will surely split. King is religious, gentle and apologetic, focusing on whats good for the group; while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for his own personal hate against the government.
I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for the law Martin Luther King, p.
Is it not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right?Oct 27, · The Power of Peace Thoreau, Gandhi, and King.
The Power of Peace: Thoreau, Gandhi, and King a young minister named Martin Luther King, Jr. began his own nonviolent fight. America's government was supposed to protect our citizens' rights and opportunities, but in many places, in many ways, governments specifically.
Share your dream now and visit the King Center Digital Archive to see more than 10, documents from Martin Luther King's personal collection and. Comparing Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail Words | 3 Pages JeffersonThoreau, a transcendentalist from the mid 19th century and Martin Luther King Jr., the Civil Rights movement leader of a century later both believed the necessity of medicine for government.
Martin Luther King Martin Luther King was an extremely inspirational individual, a humanitarian, civil rights activist in fact. He led the Montgomery Bus Boycott inhelped CSLC inhelped to organise the March on Washington in which he presented his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech gaining his reputation as one of the greatest.
This Essay Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau and other 64,+ term papers, while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for his own personal hate against the government.
Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau have the same ideas, but view them differently. Henry David Thoreau's Views: As Seen 4/4(1). Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience) was actually found in Thoreau's Civil Disobedience.
Thoreau was apparently paraphrasing the motto of The United States Magazine and Democratic Review: "The best government is that which governs least." Martin Luther King, ultimedescente.com published:Download