At the introduction of the case, Henry tam and mgi team is described as a devoted, hard-working student. Sasha expresses frustration as he feels he is being alienated by the group.
Secondly, there seemed to be a main group and subgroups with no integration. Team members have used commonality and reciprocity to others. McNamara stated that the major ways that people use to deal with conflict are as follows: It has been many weeks since the group wanted to come up with a business plan.
This would be an individual who would ensure: Root Causes of the Teams Process Problems There are four factors to consider when setting up an effective team.
Firstly, Henry should caution to the team of the looming time line ahead and advise the team to appoint an effective leader immediately to align the team and integrate their works together. He should have explained the need to give and take among team members.
In our opinion, we believe that if the MGI team members should come together with a strong sense of consensus and commitment for its team. Alex views Sasha as aggressive and strong-willed. This concept is essentially vital for the development and stimulation of the relationship and interest among the team B.
Cohen Harper Business,Leadership Engine: The MGI Team meetings and discussion styles are not effective, failing to produce positive results.
Henry does a lot of market research and believes the product should be marketed to teachers and education market. Most of the team members liked him.
It was clear the team did not had a leader and no specific roles were assigned for the team members. Another recommendation is to establish a clear team leader to develop credibility. The team begins to form a culture of its own. On paper, we identified a multi talented team composition as one of the strengths.
The members were unable to listen actively and communicate properly. Focus on working together. Rationale There would also be heated discussions in regarding how to proceed.
Henry and Dana wanted to join the HBS business plan contest to test their abilities so for them the goal is to develop a business plan in time for the contest. We would evaluate if the differences amongst the team members were a liability or an asset from two perspectives.
Dana and Henry were both HBS students but on paper, they had no track record in helping start-up companies except coming from an Ivy League university. He has to step in to establish better management of agreements and build unity and encourage collaboration through supporting, empathizing, and harmonizing.
Doing so will increase efficiency and clarify roles and agendas. But the time crunch meant that they would not have enough time to find a leader from outside.
Nonetheless on the whole, we felt the team presented enormous potential for success together based on their knowledge, skill sets and expertise but personality dynamics could be the critical stumbling block.
It was a complex dynamic. We saw complete blunder in the norming stage because the team had not sat down to discuss the norms and values to follow in order to achieve their goal. More drastic steps could be taken, but would require much more change.
The members think their personalities are effective in the group, and will not be eager to change.Within a short time frame, seven diverse team members assemble to write a business plan for a new company and struggle to define their roles, make decisions together, and resolve conflict.
HENRY TAM and the MGI TEAM case overview introductory icebreaker team process team analysis group dynamic strengths/weaknesses of diversity team communication. Within a short time frame, seven diverse team members assemble to write a business plan for a new company and struggle to define their roles, make decisions together, and resolve conflict.
Henry Tam, a second-year Harvard MBA student, who joins an aspiring start-up company and a fellow classmate to enter the school's business plan contest. The founders of the company are two internationally. HENRY TAM and the MGI TEAM HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL Harvard Business School Business Plan Contest 3 weeks left Education or Entertainment market Group is divided on issue 4 interrelated issues prevent group from moving forward 1.
Lack of Role Clarity 2. Leadership Vacuum 3. Lack of Constructive Climate. We would evaluate the strengths of the MGI team based on each individuals skills, knowledge, expertise and personality to analyse whether they would be a good team and would this team work.
On paper, we identified a multi talented team composition as one of the strengths. May 02, · Henry Tam faced a difficult challenge as he began his business plan project with Music Games International (MGI). The root of the problem is that the company culture is not adaptive.
This means that the team members do not come together and support change to enhance their productivity.Download